The hot-button "issue" thus far in my lifetime continues to be homosexuality. My heart grieves over the amount of pain and sorrow that rages when this topic is spoken about. Homosexuality becomes de-personalized and faceless as discussions rage on about "those people," "sin," as fingers are pointed and more and more people play God as decisions are made. Yesterday a colleague of mine posted on Facebook about the latest debate dealing with homosexuality: Should the BoyScout program engage young men who believe they are gay? The governing body of Men's Ministry in the UMC, The United Methodist Men have spoken out in opposition, urging the Boy Scout's to stick with their current policies excluding these specific young men from their fellowship. It sort of sounds like the UMM are asking for more time, and asking the Boy Scouts not to make any changes until.... Until when? That is one of my questions. If we continue to wait until everyone agrees on something and UMC polity actually becomes inclusive the current Boy Scouts may never live to see it!
At a denominational level the ordination of a "practicing" homosexual person is not allowed. "Incompatible with Christian teachings" are the terms used to exclude this group of people from pastoral leadership in any UMC. I guess, if you want to be technical about it, if you know you are gay and you don't "practice" that behavior then you are permitted your credentials. (So basically being gay is ok as long as you don't ever have a romantic, spousal relationship with someone). At our last General Conference this stance was upheld in the midst of much discussion and passion from both sides of the argument. (I am not even going to engage this debate here because it's not really something I can do well in a blog post.)
When it comes to the Boy Scouts I am no expert. I try my best to be as involved as possible with this group at my local church. I am proud of the young men and grateful for the strong male leadership provided by the adults in the group. As a Girl Scout drop-out I think I probably would have loved being a Boy Scout had I had the opportunity. Scouting seems to engage a group of young men that find solace in being outdoors, in learning skills that challenge their mind and character.
The Boy Scout Oath is:
- Duty to God and country,
- Duty to other people, and
- Duty to self
The Boy Scout Motto is:
Be Prepared!
The Boy Scout Law says:
A Scout is:
- Trustworthy,
- Loyal,
- Helpful,
- Friendly,
- Courteous,
- Kind,
- Obedient,
- Cheerful,
- Thrifty,
- Brave,
- Clean,
- and Reverent.
And my personal favorite, the Boy Scout slogan is: Do a Good Turn Daily!
This program teaches boys and young men some very excellent skills while also building character traits that can only help the world in which we live. I have seen young men excel at leadership in the Scouting program, where they have not had that opportunity in school. I have learned much from the young men in our troop as they teach me things about safety and the outdoors, what it means to be helpful and put others before ourselves. The young men in our troop are some of the most dedicated in our youth program and are very involved in worship and leadership in our church.
I have no idea why we would want to exclude anyone from this opportunity, least of all someone who already feels "different" due to their sexuality. I have no idea why a young man who believes he is gay should be set aside from the teachings that have changed the lives of so many of the young men that I know. This doesn't make sense to me. It is not a matter of glorifying anything or anyone, it is about a young person's opportunity to be taught healthy principles for living.
In the midst of all these discussions I keep wondering, "What if the "rules" changed?" What are we so afraid of? Honestly, if we allowed all young men and boys to participate in Scouting do we think that somehow everyone of them will become a homosexual? And as far as ordination, should homosexuality not be an issue, do we really think that all sort of "gay" people will come running to be ordained in the UMC? Trust, me when I tell you that ordination is not an easy process and I don't think it is one anyone would embark on lest they truly felt called by God, not to mention the other affirmations that must come from the people with whom they fellowship and other church leaders. This isn't like applying for a job, it is a life-calling placed upon us by God's stirring in our lives.
I am a single woman in her early thirties. When I arrived at the church I serve I was asked if I was a lesbian. It seemed that because I was single I must be! (Not to mention pretty tall, athletic, and in my black "new appointment" suit. And, I do drive a Honda Element....) I was happy to explain that I happen to be eternally single and that I'm pretty open to meeting someone to marry when the time is right. My first interview with this church and I immediately knew that this was one of those "fears" that held this church captive. I had never been confronted with this particular issue, nor have I been asked about it as much in my entire life.
As a teenager I spent weekends and summers working for a gay man in Saugatuck, MI. He treated me like gold and I respect him and love him for who he is. His sexuality never really entered my mind as an issue. He taught me so much about working hard and treating all people the way I would want my mother to be treated. God blessed me with this relationship.
I have always believed that God is a God of relationships (3 in 1, after all). That God desires us to be in relationship with Him and with others. God has given us a gift in allowing us the emotions and opportunities to fall in love and be intimate with another person. Asking someone to abstain from giving and receiving that kind of love seems like a sin to me. Telling a young person who is in the throws of adolescent awkwardness that he can't join the Boy Scouts seems pretty sin-like too.
I love so many parts of what we do as The United Methodist Church. I believe that our theology is right-on and conveys the deep well of grace from which our world needs to drink. What would happen if we focused more on sharing the love of Christ than we do on who is right and who is wrong. We are distracted, we are paralyzed, and we're running out of time.
For this my heart grieves.
Pastor Devon, thank you for sharing this bit of burden from your heart. This subject weighs heavily on my heart and mind too.
ReplyDeleteSince childhood I've lived with differences of opinion on what's right and wrong. I often feel a little extreme in my personal standards of morality, but I think Christians are called to a high standard. We are also called to love and not to judge. It's paradoxical. We need to stand for what's right without judging.
So I've learned to accept people and love them even when they do things I don't approve of--things that I think break our creator's heart. Things that appear in lists of sins in the Bible: drunkenness, greed, anger, foul language, course joking, materialism, etc. I'm surrounded by sinners, but I'm in good company because I'm guilty to. Loving fellow sinners has become easy for me.
I consider any sexual activity except between a married man and woman sin. But I've had many good friends who are sexually active outside of marriage. I've had friends who like to get drunk, were greedy, materialistic, told dirty jokes, etc. Their morals are different than mine, but I don't look down on them as inferior and I don't think I have to accept their lifestyle to love them. If I do something that they think is wrong I hope they'll extend the same grace to me.
What I have trouble with is when people come out and demand that everyone accept their lifestyle as morally permissible. When a pastor says "I'm going to practice this lifestyle and it's not sin and you need to accept it," they're forcing me to make a public stand on the issue. I have to stand on the side I believe to be right.
It's the same with scouts. We take an oath to be "morally straight." I don't pry into scouts private lives. If a scout is having sex with his girlfriend, likes to get drunk, uses foul language, or a host of other private moral issues I'm not going on a witch hunt to weed him out of my troop. But if he makes it a public issue in the troop then I have to deal with it.
I'm still struggling with this, but that's where I'm at today. We can respect a wide range of moral beliefs as long as you keep them private. In areas where there's a lot of disagreement, organizations such as the church and scouts need to take a stand without going on a witch hunt. When individuals or groups push to make something morally acceptable that scripture seems to condemn we need to push back as gently as possible, but firmly so we're not just pushed over.
Does that make sense?